Petaluma Politics–Too Broke To Fix?

Much has been written about the divisive & dysfunctional nature of California politics. Two recent newspaper columns touched on the current state of  local politics–Don Bennett’s Argus Column of August 23, 2009 and Pete Golis’ Press Democrat column of July 19, 2009. 

Of course, political divides exist in Petaluma and they are well known–growth vs. no growth (or smart growth vs “development by right”), Big Box vs. Eggcentric, East Side vs. West Side, etc. etc. 

I used to rail against these “divides” and berate those who contributed to them.  Frankly, to do so was  naive.  My only defense–weak though it may be– is that I thought we should reach a certain plateau of common understanding in our public dialogue. 

Achievement of a “common understanding” or consensus is extremely rare–decisions are made by those with sufficient votes to prevail.  There is nothing new in all of this. The fact is that political and social “divides” are hard wired into our Western Cultural DNA. Moreover, thay have not always been resolved by elections or decisions by our elected representatives.

A few brief examples…

  • A President who ordered law enforcement officials to arrest and imprison all who disagreed with him. ( No, not George W. Bush–John Adams. )
  • A President who openly ignored a Supreme Court decision. (Abraham Lincoln)
  • A Congressman (Griswold) who assaulted another House Member (Lyons) on the House floor with a cane–”Griswold was laying on blows with all his might…on the head, shoulder & arms of Lyon.”
  • Gadfly videos on CaliforniaCItyNews where you can witness City government meetings populated with ranting and raving members of the public as well as council members sometimes resisting arrest as they are dragged off the dais.  
  • On a personal note, I recall an instance where I dodged a haymaker punch by an Illinois legislator who took umbrage at a tax question.

The reality of our history is one of constant political conflict–and conflict that frequently includes abuse of power, personal attacks, and sometimes physical assault. This has occurred and occurs at all levels of government. 

At this point, a quote from the Golis column is in order:

The tribalism of our politics is now all-too-familiar. We don’t elect people who think first of what’s best for the common good. We elect people who are pro-business or slow-growth, who side with public employees unions or who oppose new taxes.

Then we are surprised that when these people are thrown together, they can’t find common ground to solve problems before they morph into one crisis and then another and another.

People who are not invested in state and local politics often find that it is irrelevant to their lives – because it is irrelevant to their lives.

Hometown governments are being gutted. A record number of housing foreclosures is devastating neighborhoods and families. Local business are going broke. Thousands of local people can’t find the work they need to support their families.

And what’s going on in local government? The Petaluma City Council is re-arranging the deck chairs on the Planning Commission, and the Healdsburg City Council is taking a firm stand against Starbuck’s.”

Granted, Golis presents a grim view of the situation.  In my opinion, he is pretty close to the mark.  However, his assessment that people find local politics to be “irrelevant to their lives” does need some expansion.  Granted they may perceive politics as irrelevant. But they are witnessing the impact nonetheless… 

August 13 2009 Download 006fountains-online-0051August 13 2009 Download 003

In Closing

Are our local divides so great that they can’t be bridged? 

 Is Petaluma too broke to fix? 

  • I submit that the answers are “Yes” to the first question and “No” to the second question. 
  • In short, nothing is broken. It is just politics as usual–at all levels of government from Petaluma through Sacramento all the way to Washington D.C–And it was ever thus.

In our hierarchical world, it is difficult, if not impossible, for institutions at the bottom of the institutional pyramid to be better than those at the top. Or put another way, excrement always flows downhill.

Lucchesi’s Still & Stagnant Waters–Redux

On July 12, I published photos and comments on the sorry conditions around our Community Center and the Lucchesi Pond. (Click Here)

On July 25, I noticed that the fountains were finally in operation after being out of service since last winter…Publication1

I can also report that the level of duck & goose poop on the sidewalks has once again been reduced to “manageable” levels.  Ducks & geese being what they are, there is always going to be some poop for pedestrians to navigate.

Huzzahs to the City for bringing this to pass in these tough budget times!

However, the pond is going to require ongoing maintenance and that will be a challenge in the months ahead.  The debris & algae build up is significant…

Fountains Online 005Fountains Online 002

Obviously, the challenge is still before us…

E-Cycling (Electronics Recycling)

The recent City sponsored recycling event on July 18 & 19 at the Community Center rounded up a considerable inventory of obsolete or broken e-gear.  All manner of  cell phones, computers, monitors & televisions were hauled in for recycling.

According to Jan Rice of Universal Waste Management (Web Site) well over 400 people came through the lines.

 According to Jan… 

  • “We filled 8 trucks for a Total  estimated 50,000- 60,000 lbs of E-waste.”
  • “35 pallets of CRT’s were collected at an average of 1000 lbs each- so we collected 35,000 lbs of CRT (tv’s and monitors) which is nearly 10,000 lbs MORE than our last event-in January!!!!!!”
  • “I think the MOST important thing to note is that nothing is shipped to LAND-FILLS. “

Jluly 18 2009 003

In addition, the recycling event also added clothing/textiles/shoes as items that would be accepted for recycling.

Jan reports that:

  • “Over 7,200,000,000 lbs of Clothing, Textiles, etc. were dumped in landfills last year. (based on EPA estimates) which is absolutely HORRIBLE. All of the textile, clothing, etc. we collect is recycled.” 
  • “We take everything back to our facility where it is separated.  What can be “Re-Used” will be donated or sold for re-use. There is  material that cannot be re-used, for hygiene reasons, damage, etc. It will be recycled in a process that is similar to paper recycling which is basically soaked until the materials start to break down to fibers so that they can then be re-made into new product… like stuffing for futons, for example…or non-toxic insulation for houses and things like that.” 
All in all a very successful operation. Congratulations to those who made it possible and to all those who took the time to bring the items for recycling!
In closing, there might have been a bit of confusion as to the nature of the event. It was  for Recycling–Not Unicycling…
Super Unicycle Collage

Free Petaluma!

No, I am not suggesting in the title that Petaluma is in need of liberation. I use “free” in the sense that there are a number of events one can attend without an admission fee.  In these recessionary times, every little bit helps.

For example, in July there was the Petaluma Art & Garden Show…Collage 1July 2009 004July 2009 005

And then there was the recent “Classic Wings & Wheels” at the Petaluma Airport.

First, a sample of the Wings…Collage 1Collage 2

Finally, a sample of the Wheels…Collage 3

Instituto Vino Advice–Part I

Tristan E. Isolde, our Director of Cheap & Trashy Personal Counseling brought an interesting letter to our attention.  The author of the letter was seeking guidance on how to deal with friends who were, for lack of a better phrase, decidedly cheap.

LETTER

TO: Internationale Instituto De Vino Wino, Petaluma, California

We have dissed pals who consistently serve the cheapest wine to be found on earth.  Here’s their new low – AND IT IS ABSOLUTELY TRUE!

For my husband’s birthday they brought a lavishly wrapped bottle (these are the same folks with the $80 nitrogen rig to preserve $3 wine) and made much of toasting the occasion with champagne.  I feared the worst, but this was beyond my wildest fears – a $4 unchilled bottle of  sparkling wine!  It may be banned in CA – it’s used motor oil with injected carbonation.  

They are assuredly NOT financially strapped, and this was not a joke gift, so I turn to the Instituto – my husband is pissed off and insulted, while I take a more sanguine view (it’s good for stain removal.) 

  • Are these people insane?
  • How can they be stopped? 
  • Who should they be reported to? 

What retaliation does the Instituto suggest?  Can these people be extraterrestrials?  Please consider flying Vinnie  or your enforcer, Sumo Cum Laude “Big Fish” Sashimi here on an emergency basis to “talk” some sense into these two. 

Sincerely,

Vino Blues, New York City

__________________

RESPONSE

Dear Vino Blues:

After several emergency meetings and many bottles of vin ordinaire, the entire staff of the Instituto  reached a  consensus (VERY unusual for this group)  to respond to some of your questions.

1. You say they paid $4 for an “unchilled bottle of  sparkling wine.” 

They paid $4 TOO much 

2.  You say it was ” lavishly wrapped.” 

Unless it was wrapped in the Mona Lisa–IMPOSSIBLE!!! 

3. You say it’s used motor oil with injected carbonation. 

Send them a case of 10W40. Suggest that they serve it at room temperature–as in an igloo in Nome, Alaska.  Tell them it has a body you can “cut with a knife.” 

In the alternative, give them a bottle of  sparkling cider.  If you can’t find one (We don’t know why you would normally want to do so), the Instituto will gladly provide a bottle for this worthy purpose.

As to the remaining questions in your letter, rest assured that the entire staff is locked in the wine cellar working up further suggestions to aid you in your time of need. 

We will be in touch with you shortly!

Sincerely,

Tristan E. Isolde

Director of Cheap & Trashy Personal Counseling